code-review

Review code changes for bugs, regressions, security risks, and maintainability.

Updated Feb 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PVPha/agent_skills --skill code-review-pvpha
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/PVPha/agent_skills/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PVPha/agent_skills --skill code-review-pvpha

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the code review process, helping to identify bugs, regressions, security risks, and maintainability issues before code is merged.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Checklist: Provides detailed checks for correctness, security, error handling, performance, and maintainability.
  • Feedback Guidance: Offers structured ways to provide constructive feedback (blocking, suggestions, questions, praise).
  • Author Response Guidance: Advises on how to respond to feedback and resolve disagreements.
  • Use Case: When reviewing a pull request, use this Skill to ensure all critical aspects of the code are checked systematically, leading to higher quality software.

Quick Start

Use the code-review skill to review the attached pull request for potential security vulnerabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a pull request for security vulnerabilities and maintainability issues?

To review a pull request for security vulnerabilities, apply a structured checklist covering correctness, error handling, and performance. This ensures all critical aspects of the code are systematically checked before merging.

What is the best way to provide constructive feedback during a code review?

Providing constructive feedback during a code review involves using structured guidance for blocking issues, suggestions, questions, and praise. This approach helps authors improve software quality while facilitating team knowledge sharing.

How should an author respond to code review feedback and resolve disagreements?

An author should respond to code review feedback by following specific response guidance that advises on resolving disagreements. This structured approach ensures constructive communication and maintains focus on identifying bugs and regressions.

Can I use a structured checklist to catch bugs and regressions in code changes?

Yes, you can use a structured checklist to catch bugs and regressions in code changes. The checklist provides detailed checks for correctness and performance, streamlining the review process to enhance overall software quality.

Does this code review approach support both reviewer and author perspectives?

Yes, this code review approach supports both reviewer and author perspectives by providing feedback guidelines and response guidance. It focuses on identifying maintainability issues to improve code quality and facilitate team knowledge sharing.