CODE REVIEW & QUALITY AUDITING

Identify logic flaws, security risks, and architectural misalignments in code changes.

2|Updated Apr 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Kingdaddy007/Antigravity-OS --skill code-review-quality-auditing
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: CODE REVIEW & QUALITY AUDITING
Source: https://github.com/Kingdaddy007/Antigravity-OS/tree/main/global/skills/review-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Kingdaddy007/Antigravity-OS --skill code-review-quality-auditing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured, expert-driven approach to code reviews, ensuring defects, security gaps, and architectural misalignments are identified before changes merge.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ten-lens review framework: Intent, correctness, maintainability, risk, error handling, security, performance, tests, consistency, and change impact.
  • Structured feedback: Clear, actionable recommendations with rationale and suggested fixes.
  • Quality gate: Serves as a gate before merges or deployments and guides on-call reviews in production.
  • Use Case: Auditing a PR for critical security flaws in a legacy module.

Quick Start

Run a code review on a PR or code block using the 10 lenses to generate targeted, actionable feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about CODE REVIEW & QUALITY AUDITING

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a rigorous code review to identify security risks and logic flaws before merging?

Perform a rigorous code review by applying a ten-lens framework that evaluates intent, correctness, maintainability, risk, error handling, security, performance, tests, consistency, and change impact to generate targeted, actionable feedback.

What is the best way to audit legacy code for architectural misalignments and security gaps?

The best way to audit legacy code is using a structured quality audit framework that identifies architectural misalignments and security gaps, providing clear recommendations with rationale and suggested fixes before changes merge.

How do I structure code review feedback so it provides clear, actionable recommendations?

Structure code review feedback using a triage-based approach that applies a ten-lens review framework, ensuring recommendations include clear rationale and suggested fixes for identified defects and architectural misalignments.

Can I use this code review framework for on-call verification in production environments?

Yes, you can use this code review framework for on-call verification in production environments, as it serves as an auditable quality gate to ensure robust verification during on-call reviews and before merges.

Does this code review approach enforce a quality gate for code merges?

Yes, this code review approach enforces an auditable quality gate for code merges by applying a ten-lens review framework and triage-based feedback to block defects, security risks, and architectural misalignments.

When do I need a ten-lens review framework for my pull requests?

You need a ten-lens review framework for pull requests when you want to ensure robust quality gates by systematically evaluating intent, correctness, maintainability, risk, error handling, security, performance, tests, consistency, and change impact.