code-review

Analyze code diffs and report security, quality, and maintainability issues.

2|1|Updated Oct 8, 2009
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/riethmayer/dotfiles --skill code-review-riethmayer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/riethmayer/dotfiles/tree/main/stow/agents/.agents/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/riethmayer/dotfiles --skill code-review-riethmayer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates comprehensive code reviews to identify security, quality, and maintainability issues across changes, reducing manual review time.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Security-focused analysis of diffs, highlighting vulnerabilities and insecure patterns
  • Code quality and maintainability scoring with actionable recommendations
  • PR guidance with severity ratings (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW) and suggested fixes
  • Optional delegation to an expert reviewer agent for in-depth analysis
  • Use case: during PR reviews to surface issues before merging and accelerate approved changes

Quick Start

Provide a git diff or PR URL to begin an automated thorough review and receive a prioritized report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for pull requests?

Automated code reviews analyze diffs to identify security, quality, and maintainability issues. This process scores issues by severity and outputs a structured report with concrete fix suggestions.

Can I get security and maintainability scoring from a static analysis of my diff?

Static analysis of your diff highlights security vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and maintainability issues. It provides code quality scoring alongside actionable recommendations to improve changes before merging.

How do I categorize pull request vulnerabilities by severity before merging?

Categorize pull request vulnerabilities by reviewing a structured report that assigns severity ratings. Issues are scored as CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW, helping prioritize fixes before merging.

Does automated code review work across different programming languages?

Automated code review works across languages by analyzing the provided git diff. It identifies maintainability, security, and quality issues in code changes regardless of the specific programming language.

What is the best way to surface code quality issues during feature work?

The best way to surface code quality issues during feature work is applying automated analysis to diffs. This provides PR guidance with severity ratings and suggested fixes to accelerate approved changes.

When should I use an automated code reviewer instead of manual review?

Use an automated code reviewer to reduce manual review time by surfacing critical security and quality issues before merging. It provides prioritized, actionable fix suggestions at PR speed.