code-review

To automatically review a pull request for spec compliance, you can invoke a code review skill after task completion to evaluate diffs against the intended plan, detect deviations, and surface quality issues. It generates a final review verdict to gate task progression.

Testing theatre detection in code review is the process of identifying superficial or non-functional tests that simulate coverage without actually validating code behavior. It checks for critical issues to ensure changes meet project criteria and enforce genuine quality assurance.

You can validate code changes against a plan by running an automated review process between tasks that compares the diff with the intended plan. This enforces structured input and evaluates changes for security, broken functionality, and standards compliance.

Yes, you can gate task progression based on code review grades by applying a review skill within plan-execution workflows. It evaluates diffs, checks for critical issues like security flaws, and generates a final grade and detailed report to block or allow progression.

To detect regressions and deviations in a code diff, use an automated code review process that compares completed work against the intended plan. It identifies non-compliant changes, security issues, and broken functionality, providing structured feedback.