Review GitHub PRs across five quality axes and post annotated comments.
npx skills add https://github.com/rodacato/kwik-e-dev --skill code-review-rodacato
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-review Source: https://github.com/rodacato/kwik-e-dev/tree/main/plugins/lifecycle/skills/code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rodacato/kwik-e-dev --skill code-review-rodacato
Reviewing pull requests can be time-consuming and error-prone; this skill automates and structures the multi-axis PR review using the gh CLI, helping ensure consistent quality and thorough feedback before merge.
Run the code-review skill on a pull request to generate and post a multi-axis review using gh
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Automated pull request reviews evaluate code changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. The skill fetches diffs via the gh CLI and generates structured, annotated comments with file, line, severity, and rationale directly on GitHub.
Yes, agent-authored code changes can be reviewed using this skill. It applies a structured five-axis evaluation to any GitHub pull request, regardless of whether the modifications were written by a human or an AI agent.
Yes, the gh CLI is required to run these automated code reviews. The skill depends on the GitHub command line interface to fetch pull request metadata and post structured review comments back to the repository.
The best way to structure PR feedback is to evaluate changes across five axes: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. This skill enforces this structured evaluation and ties findings to specific files, lines, and rationale to guide merge decisions.
Multi-axis code review handles performance and architecture checks by fetching PR diffs and evaluating them against project conventions. It identifies specific quality issues across these domains and generates structured comments with severity and rationale.
Automated review automation should be used when you need consistent, structured quality feedback before merging. It enforces best practices and project conventions across five evaluation axes, ensuring thorough feedback for both human and agent-authored changes.
theomonfortGenerate structured pull request descriptions from GitHub diffs and commits.
rajveersingh11Automate pull request triage with CI status, review comments, and merge readiness.
chtughaMonitor pull request readiness across code review, tests, security, QA, and linting.
inbharataiAnalyzes code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and style violations.
