skills.rest
RyoyaYahagi
RyoyaYahagiCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-review

Audits code diffs against project rules and risk criteria for CI/PR workflows.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#security#audit#diff#code-review#risk#pull-request#test-coverage
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RyoyaYahagi/skills --skill code-review-ryoyayahagi
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/RyoyaYahagi/skills/tree/main/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RyoyaYahagi/skills --skill code-review-ryoyayahagi

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews often miss risks, test coverage gaps, and rule violations during PR evaluations, leading to undetected issues and unstable releases.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evaluates diffs against project rules.md and security guidelines
  • Identifies gaps in test coverage and potential risk patterns in changes
  • Produces actionable feedback and suggested fixes for maintainers and reviewers

Quick Start

Analyze the latest PR diff using the code-review skill to surface violations and recommended fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit code changes for security risks and rule violations in a pull request?▼

To audit code changes, evaluate the PR diff against project rules.md and security guidelines. This identifies potential risk patterns and rule violations, producing actionable feedback with suggested fixes for maintainers and reviewers.

Can I automate test coverage gap detection during code reviews?▼

Yes, you can automate test coverage gap detection during code reviews. The skill evaluates diffs to identify gaps in test coverage and potential risk patterns, producing deterministic outputs suitable for integration with CI and PR tooling.

What is the best way to enforce project rules and security guidelines on a diff?▼

The best way to enforce project rules and security guidelines on a diff is to audit the code changes against rules.md. This process surfaces violations, identifies risk patterns, and produces actionable feedback with recommended fixes.

Does the code review skill integrate with CI pipelines and PR tooling?▼

Yes, the code review skill integrates with CI pipelines and PR tooling. It produces deterministic outputs from auditing diffs against rules.md and test-coverage criteria, making it suitable for automated PR workflows.

Why do code reviews miss security risks and test coverage gaps?▼

Code reviews miss security risks and test coverage gaps because manual PR evaluations often overlook rule violations and risk patterns. Auditing code changes against project rules and security guidelines surfaces these undetected issues to prevent unstable releases.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
sajalsuhanesajalsuhane

review

Audit PR diffs for SQL safety, data integrity, and scope drift.

Community
Advanced
ManfronEnricoManfronEnrico

workspace-enforce

Block merges when high-severity workspace violations lack waivers.

Community
Advanced
AZANIRAZANIR
2

qa-coverage-analyzer

Analyze test coverage across requirements traceability, ISO 29119-4 techniques, and code coverage metrics.

Community
Advanced
Bruno-YuBruno-Yu

spectra-audit

Audit code changes for security sharp edges in APIs and configurations.

Community
Advanced