code-review

Review code, diffs, or pull requests using a five-step methodology.

285|39|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill code-review-shawnpang
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill code-review-shawnpang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

AI-assisted reviews of code for quality, correctness, and security, reducing time to merge.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured five-step workflow: Context, Structure, Details, Tests, Feedback tailored to code, PRs, or diffs.
  • Language-agnostic review: Works across languages and frameworks, with guidance aligned to project patterns.
  • Risk-aware feedback: Highlights correctness, security, performance, and maintainability concerns.

Quick Start

Provide a structured five-step code review for the given code snippet or PR, following the Context → Structure → Details → Tests → Feedback workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I do an AI-assisted code review on a pull request diff?

AI-assisted code review on a pull request diff evaluates correctness, security, performance, and maintainability using a five-step workflow covering Context, Structure, Details, Tests, and Feedback.

Can I use this code review workflow for any programming language or framework?

Yes, this code review workflow is language-agnostic and works across any programming language or framework, applying structured analysis to standalone code samples, diffs, or pull requests.

What is the structured methodology for reviewing code security and performance?

The structured methodology for reviewing code security and performance follows a five-step process: Context, Structure, Details, Tests, and Feedback, providing risk-aware assessments tailored to project patterns.

How do I assess code correctness and maintainability in a PR?

To assess code correctness and maintainability in a PR, apply a structured review workflow that examines structural changes, details, and tests, delivering risk-aware feedback aligned with project coding standards.

Does this AI code review work with standalone code snippets or only PR diffs?

This AI code review works with both standalone code snippets and PR diffs, applying its five-step methodology to assess quality, correctness, and security regardless of the input format.

What is the best way to automate security reviews for pull requests?

The best way to automate security reviews for pull requests is applying a structured, risk-aware AI workflow that evaluates code details and tests against project context to highlight vulnerabilities.