code-review-skill

Review Flutter code by evaluating submissions against a 7-criteria checklist covering functionality, readability, optimization, architecture, design system usage, linting, and testing. This structured process checks null safety, error handling, and architecture consistency to identify defects and return severity scores.

Automate Dart code reviews by running a deterministic checklist during pull requests or CI pipelines. The evaluation enforces Flutter analyze compliance, checks for unit and widget tests, and returns severity scores for each criterion to reduce reviewer bias.

Yes, the code review process explicitly checks for unit and widget tests as part of its testing guidance criterion. It evaluates testing coverage alongside functionality, architecture, and linting to provide a complete quality assessment.

Yes, you can enforce Flutter analyze compliance on pull requests by running this evaluation. It checks linting rules, null safety, and proper error handling as part of a deterministic 7-criteria process to ensure code aligns with project quality gates.

Identify architectural inconsistencies by evaluating Flutter code against a structured architecture criterion within the 7-point checklist. This deterministic review checks for design system usage and architecture alignment, returning severity scores to highlight quality gaps.

The checklist focuses on seven specific dimensions: functionality, readability, optimization, architecture, design system, linting, and testing. It provides deterministic, reproducible feedback based on these criteria but does not evaluate aspects outside this defined scope.