Evaluate code changes and generate prioritized actionable feedback.
npx skills add https://github.com/sontek/agent-skills --skill code-review-sontek
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-review Source: https://github.com/sontek/agent-skills/tree/main/plugins/agent-skills/skills/code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sontek/agent-skills --skill code-review-sontek
Reviewing code changes can be error-prone and inconsistent. This Skill provides a structured process and guidelines to help engineers perform thorough, repeatable code reviews, improving quality, security, and maintainability.
Use the code-review skill to review a PR by providing the PR URL or git diff, for example: Review PR https://github.com/your/repo/pull/123 or describe the changes with git diff.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Automating code review for a pull request involves providing the PR URL or git diff to generate a prioritized list of actionable feedback. The process evaluates security, performance, testing, and design to ensure consistent quality checks.
Structuring pull request feedback requires a prioritized format separating issues into critical, important, and suggestions. This enforces a repeatable review process by guiding reviewers through a defined checklist of engineering best practices and design considerations.
Reviewing a git diff for security and performance issues is achieved by applying a structured evaluation checklist to the provided patch set. This identifies vulnerabilities and bottlenecks while enforcing minimal, focused edits to prevent scope creep.
Preventing scope creep when reviewing code changes is handled by enforcing a change discipline that demands minimal, focused edits. The review workflow guides evaluators from context gathering to delivering actionable feedback, ensuring changes remain targeted.
Automated code review works without directly connecting a repository by accepting pasted git diffs or patch sets as input. You can describe the changes directly to evaluate testing coverage and design considerations without needing live repository access.
Limitations of using a checklist for code reviews include its basic implementation depth, which provides structured guidance but relies on the reviewer to supply accurate diffs. It does not automatically fetch changes or execute automated tests.
zyj18860969891-byteGenerate shareable diffs and patch views with viewer URLs and file artifacts.
darkroomengineeringReview TypeScript, React, and architecture for quality, security, and correctness issues.
petrkohutAutomate test quality review and validation against best practices.
IndustrialAnalyze code for security vulnerabilities and performance issues.
