code-review

Review code diffs and branches for security and maintainability issues.

Updated Apr 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Srujan0798/NRG --skill code-review-srujan0798
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/Srujan0798/NRG/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Srujan0798/NRG --skill code-review-srujan0798

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps engineers achieve higher code quality by providing a structured mentor-style review process focused on security, patterns, and architectural alignment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Review Protocol: Step-by-step evaluation of changes to identify defects, security gaps, and architectural drift.
  • Maintainable Guidance: Offers actionable feedback that is easy to implement and re-usable across projects.
  • Use Case: Apply during pull requests to ensure consistent standards before merge, or for auditing legacy codebases during refactors.

Quick Start

Submit a diff or specify the file or branch to review using the /code-review command.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured code review for security and architectural alignment?

A structured code review evaluates diffs or branches using a defined protocol to identify security gaps, design pattern violations, and architectural drift. It provides actionable, mentor-grade guidance to improve maintainability before merging changes.

Can I audit a legacy codebase for quality and maintainability?

Yes, you can audit legacy codebases by applying a consistent review protocol to evaluate design patterns, security vulnerabilities, and maintainability. This process yields clear reporting of architectural defects and actionable refactoring guidance.

What's the best way to review pull requests for design patterns and security gaps?

The best way to review pull requests is applying a step-by-step evaluation protocol that identifies defects, detects security gaps, and checks design pattern consistency. This ensures maintainable standards before merging code changes.

Does the code review protocol work across different programming languages and architectures?

Yes, the review protocol works across multiple languages and architectures by performing deep, structured consistency checks. It evaluates security, design patterns, and maintainability standards regardless of the specific codebase structure.

How do I get actionable feedback on a branch diff before merging?

Submit a branch diff to receive mentor-grade feedback that identifies architectural drift and security gaps. The structured review process reports findings clearly, offering maintainable guidance that is easy to implement before the merge.