code-review-three-forms

Reviews R scripts for API misuse and flags inaccurate/nonexistent library functions and parameters in real-time.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danmaclean/ai_workshop --skill code-review-three-forms
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-three-forms
Source: https://github.com/danmaclean/ai_workshop/tree/main/outputs/demo_materials/code-review-three-forms/skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danmaclean/ai_workshop --skill code-review-three-forms

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps identify common methodological errors and package usage issues in AI-generated R analysis code, ensuring code quality and correctness.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Issue Identification: Checks for non-existent functions, incorrect defaults, and domain mismatches in R scripts.
  • Standards Enforcement: Validates adherence to package conventions and project-specific settings.
  • Use Case: A bioinformatics analyst runs script reviews to catch fabricated function names or misused defaults before analysis publication.

Quick Start

Use the skill to review the R scripts located in the scripts/ directory for package API irregularities and common pitfalls.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-three-forms

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check R scripts for fabricated functions and methodological errors in bioinformatics code?

To check R scripts for fabricated functions and methodological errors, this code review skill analyzes script content for non-existent functions, incorrect defaults, and domain mismatches. It validates adherence to package conventions to ensure code quality.

What common methodological pitfalls can automated R code review detect in statistical analysis workflows?

Automated R code review detects methodological pitfalls like fabricated function names, misused default parameters, and domain errors within statistical analysis workflows. It identifies these issues by checking scripts against known package quirks and common bioinformatics errors.

How do I validate R code against package conventions and project-specific settings before analysis publication?

To validate R code against package conventions before analysis publication, run automated reviews on your scripts to catch package API irregularities and default misapplications. This enforces standards by checking for known package quirks and domain mismatches.

Can I use automated code review to find AI-generated R analysis errors and package API irregularities?

Yes, you can use automated code review to find AI-generated R analysis errors and package API irregularities. It streamlines detection of coding errors and methodological pitfalls, specifically targeting fabricated functions and default misapplications common in AI outputs.

Does code review for R scripts support quality assurance workflows in bioinformatics?

Yes, code review for R scripts supports quality assurance workflows in bioinformatics. It is specifically applicable to QA processes, allowing bioinformatics analysts to catch domain errors and misused defaults before analysis publication.