What problem does it solve? Reviewing pull requests thoroughly is time-consuming and error-prone: reviewers miss scope creep, dead code, vacuous tests, and semantic bugs that compile cleanly. This Skill enforces a disciplined, senior-engineer-level review process so nothing slips through. ## Core Features & Use Cases - 12-phase structured workflow: Gathers PR context via the gh CLI, validates scope against linked issues, studies existing codebase patterns in an isolated git worktree, then reviews file-by-file. - Adversarial semantic verification: A separate re-read of every changed file checks whether tests would actually fail if the feature broke and whether application logic does what it claims. - Cyclomatic complexity audit: Counts decision points per function using defined rules, maps findings to a cause-to-transformation catalog, and reports prioritized fixes. - Use Case: A teammate opens a PR touching 15 files. Run this Skill to produce a prioritized review report (High/Medium/Low), post an approve or request-changes verdict to GitHub after your confirmation, and optionally squash-merge. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to review a pull request by pasting its GitHub URL, for example: review this PR https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123.