code-review

Automate code reviews by analyzing pull request diffs against linked stories, tests, and coding standards. This process verifies requirement alignment, identifies OWASP security gaps, and generates actionable feedback for pull requests and commits.

Static analysis checks for maintainability enforce naming conventions, code structure, and readability standards. By analyzing diffs against project linting rules, the review identifies defects and generates concrete recommendations to improve overall code quality.

Yes, you can identify OWASP vulnerabilities from a git diff before merging. Security analysis checks the diff against project security guidelines to detect common vulnerabilities and provides actionable remediation steps directly in the review report.

To run an automated code review, you must provide the pull request diff, the PR link, and related user stories. Access to project conventions like linting rules, test coverage metrics, and security guidelines is also required to generate feedback.

No, automated code review requires access to project conventions including linting rules, test coverage, and security guidelines. Without these coding standards, the review cannot accurately evaluate code quality, maintainability, or story alignment.

The code review ensures actionable feedback by generating concrete recommendations with clear reasoning based on the diff analysis. It maps code changes directly to requirements and quality gates, making every identified defect or security gap fully traceable.