Manage code review processes with verification gates and evidence-based claims.
npx skills add https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit --skill code-review-trungdo9
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-review Source: https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit/tree/main/skills/software/code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit --skill code-review-trungdo9
This Skill helps in conducting thorough code reviews, ensuring technical rigor and evidence-based claims, and providing a structured approach to verification before making any completion claims.
To initiate a code review, use the command: /ck:code-review <feature-name>
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To ensure technical rigor in a code review, you must enforce evidence-based claims and require fresh verification evidence before approving any completion claims. This promotes technical correctness over social comfort during software development workflows.
The best way to identify edge cases before a code review is to run a pre-review edge-case scout. This process automatically highlights potential issues and verifies code changes against expected behavior before stakeholders assess the feature.
You manage verification gates by requiring fresh verification evidence before allowing any code completion claims. This structured approach ensures that complex features pass technical rigor checks before merging into the main branch.
Yes, you can automate requesting a review by dispatching a code-reviewer subagent. This automates the process of initiating technical verification and evidence-based claims assessment for your software development workflow.
Yes, this code review process is designed for software development environments where multiple stakeholders review code changes. It applies verification gates and technical rigor to ensure all necessary reviews are completed before merging complex features.
When receiving feedback, you should focus on understanding and acting on the technical evidence provided. The process prioritizes technical correctness over social comfort, ensuring changes meet verification standards before completion.
DangQuangSEFacilitate code review workflows with verification protocols and technical rigor.
Khoatran1999Evaluate code changes against evidence with verification gates before merging.
NammDevAutomate evidence-based code review workflows with SHA verification gates.
Hoang130203Request code reviews from a subagent before merging changes.
