code-review

Manage code review processes with verification gates and evidence-based claims.

3|1|Updated Dec 5, 2025

Search Tags:#code review #software development #verification #technical rigor #evidence-based claims

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit --skill code-review-trungdo9

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit/tree/main/skills/software/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit --skill code-review-trungdo9

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps in conducting thorough code reviews, ensuring technical rigor and evidence-based claims, and providing a structured approach to verification before making any completion claims.

Core Features & Use Cases

Technical Rigor: Promotes a culture of technical correctness over social comfort.
Pre-Review Edge-Case Scout: Identifies potential issues before a review.
Verification Gates: Ensures fresh verification evidence before any completion claim.
Receiving Feedback: Guides the process of understanding and acting on code review feedback.
Requesting Review: Automates the process of dispatching a code-reviewer subagent.
Use Case: Before merging a complex feature, use this Skill to ensure that all necessary reviews and verifications are completed.

Quick Start

To initiate a code review, use the command: /ck:code-review <feature-name>

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I ensure technical rigor during a code review?▼

To ensure technical rigor in a code review, you must enforce evidence-based claims and require fresh verification evidence before approving any completion claims. This promotes technical correctness over social comfort during software development workflows.

What is the best way to identify edge cases before a code review?▼

The best way to identify edge cases before a code review is to run a pre-review edge-case scout. This process automatically highlights potential issues and verifies code changes against expected behavior before stakeholders assess the feature.

How do I manage verification gates for software development workflows?▼

You manage verification gates by requiring fresh verification evidence before allowing any code completion claims. This structured approach ensures that complex features pass technical rigor checks before merging into the main branch.

Can I automate dispatching a code reviewer for a feature merge?▼

Yes, you can automate requesting a review by dispatching a code-reviewer subagent. This automates the process of initiating technical verification and evidence-based claims assessment for your software development workflow.

Does this code review process work for complex feature merges with multiple stakeholders?▼

Yes, this code review process is designed for software development environments where multiple stakeholders review code changes. It applies verification gates and technical rigor to ensure all necessary reviews are completed before merging complex features.

How should I handle receiving feedback in a technically rigorous code review?▼

When receiving feedback, you should focus on understanding and acting on the technical evidence provided. The process prioritizes technical correctness over social comfort, ensuring changes meet verification standards before completion.