code-review

Review code changes for bugs and plan compliance with traceable references.

4|Updated Jan 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vertexcover-io/tarash --skill code-review-vertexcover-io
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/vertexcover-io/tarash/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vertexcover-io/tarash --skill code-review-vertexcover-io

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Deep code review that hunts for subtle bugs and, when a plan/design document is provided, verifies the change actually accomplishes what the plan describes. Invoke explicitly with /code-review — this skill never triggers automatically. Use when the user says "/code-review", "review my code", "review this change", or "review against the plan".

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Plan compliance: verify that a code change matches the described plan or design document.
  • Bug detection: identify off-by-one errors, race conditions, resource leaks, edge cases, and security issues that tests may miss.
  • Intent inference: deduce the change's intent from commit messages or PR descriptions and ensure the code does what is described.

Quick Start

Provide a plan or code changes and ask me to perform a code-review focused on plan compliance and bug detection.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify that my code changes comply with a design plan?

To verify code changes comply with a design plan, request a code review that cross-references the diff against your provided design document. It returns precise feedback on plan gaps with traceable references to the plan.

How do I find subtle bugs like race conditions or resource leaks in my pull request?

To find subtle bugs like race conditions or resource leaks in a pull request, trigger an explicit code review. It evaluates diffs and PR descriptions to identify edge cases and security issues that automated tests may miss.

Can I infer the actual intent of a commit from its commit messages and PR description?

You can infer a change's intent by deducing it from commit messages or PR descriptions during a code review. The process ensures the code actually does what the commit messages describe and flags any misalignment.

Does this code review process automatically modify my code when it finds defects?

This code review process does not automatically modify your code when it finds defects. It performs read-only diff analysis and returns precise feedback on bugs and plan gaps without performing any automated edits.

What is the best way to review code changes against a specific design document?

The best way to review code changes against a specific design document is to explicitly request a code review focused on plan compliance. Provide the plan and code changes to receive traceable feedback on defects and plan gaps.

When should I explicitly invoke a code review instead of relying on automated triggers?

You should explicitly invoke a code review when you need deep bug detection and plan compliance verification, because this skill never triggers automatically and requires a direct request like /code-review to evaluate diffs.