Review software changes across architecture, code quality, tests, performance, and security.
npx skills add https://github.com/vibbs/company-os --skill code-review-vibbs
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-review Source: https://github.com/vibbs/company-os/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vibbs/company-os --skill code-review-vibbs
This Skill addresses the challenge of ensuring code quality, consistency, and adherence to architectural standards by providing a structured, multi-section code review process.
Run a detailed code review on the current uncommitted changes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
A structured code review evaluates pull request changes across architecture, code quality, test coverage, performance, and security. It engages you section by section for interactive decision-making and generates a final review summary artifact.
A comprehensive code quality evaluation includes assessments of software architecture, code consistency, test coverage, performance optimization, and security vulnerabilities to ensure adherence to engineering standards before submission.
Yes, you can configure the code review depth. It supports a "BIG CHANGE" mode for detailed evaluations and a "SMALL CHANGE" mode for focused reviews, adapting the feedback scope to the size of your software changes.
Yes, the code review process integrates with your project configurations and engineering preferences. This ensures the actionable feedback provided aligns with your established architectural standards and coding conventions.
Interactive feedback works by engaging you section by section throughout the code review. This allows for interactive decision-making as the evaluation progresses through architecture, code quality, tests, performance, and security.
Automated code review limitations include its reliance on existing project configurations and engineering preferences. While it evaluates security and performance, it requires interactive decision-making to validate actionable feedback for complex architectural changes.
yu13130122297Identify uncertainties in research framing, datasets, metrics, and baselines.
lossyrobAnalyze implementation changes and return a pass/fail verdict with issues.
steveclarkeReview pull requests for security, performance, and architectural issues.
nschnebleAnalyze Rails code quality with Brakeman, Bundler Audit, and RuboCop.
