skills.rest
Wilder1222
Wilder1222COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-review

Analyze diffs and generate structured code-review reports aligned with the 6 Decision Principles.

2|Updated Mar 25, 2026
Search Tags:#testing#security#quality#engineering#diff#code-review#pull-request
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Wilder1222/superomni --skill code-review-wilder1222
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/Wilder1222/superomni/tree/main/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Wilder1222/superomni --skill code-review-wilder1222

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Canonical review workflow for code quality, providing structured, actionable feedback that moves PRs forward without blocking momentum.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Canonical review workflow across giving, receiving, and security-focused reviews, with a unified rubric based on the 6 Decision Principles.
  • Provides stepwise layers: Correctness, Security, Tests, Code Quality, Blast Radius, and Architecture considerations.
  • Dispatches the code-review agent with diffs and relevant source files to generate a comprehensive report and integrate results into the project.

Quick Start

Run the code-review skill against your PR by providing the diffs and repository context.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate actionable code review insights from a pull request diff?▼

To generate actionable code review insights from a pull request diff, analyze the changes against repository context to surface feedback on correctness, security, tests, performance, and readability. This approach produces a structured, auditable review artifact anchored to the project context.

What is the best way to structure security-focused code reviews for internal engineering workflows?▼

A structured security-focused code review applies a unified rubric across stepwise layers, evaluating blast radius and architecture considerations alongside correctness. This canonical workflow ensures comprehensive security analysis anchored to the 6 Decision Principles.

Can I use a single rubric for both giving and receiving code feedback across different PRs?▼

Yes, you can apply a unified rubric based on the 6 Decision Principles to standardize both giving and receiving code feedback across pull requests. This canonical review workflow generates a comprehensive, auditable report for consistent quality evaluation.

How does analyzing relevant source files improve code quality feedback during a PR review?▼

Analyzing relevant source files alongside diffs improves code quality feedback by anchoring insights to the actual project context. This dispatches a comprehensive review across correctness, tests, performance, and architecture to generate an auditable report.

What dimensions should a comprehensive code review cover to ensure software engineering quality?▼

A comprehensive code review for software engineering quality should cover stepwise layers including Correctness, Security, Tests, Code Quality, Blast Radius, and Architecture considerations. These dimensions ensure structured feedback aligned with the 6 Decision Principles.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
zerwizzerwiz

github-code-review

Review git diffs and pull requests for defects and quality issues.

Community
Advanced
robertolopezlopezrobertolopezlopez
1

github-pr-comment-analysis

Group unresolved GitHub pull request comments into actionable issue sections.

Community
Advanced
Tonybleything76Tonybleything76

PR Review Expert

Review GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs with prioritized findings and checklists.

Community
Advanced
RangeyRoverRangeyRover
3

speckit.checker

Run static analysis across multiple languages and generate prioritized issue reports.

Community
Intermediate