code-review

To review code changes in a Nuxt 4 project, apply category-specific checklists to flag critical violations, enforce security best practices, and ensure proper validation and error handling across Vue 3 components and Drizzle ORM schemas.

Automated code review in Vue 3 and Supabase projects checks for correctness, security vulnerabilities, and project convention adherence, specifically targeting high-impact mistakes like missing access checks and improper raw string enums.

Yes, you can enforce project conventions on Drizzle ORM database schemas by applying structured, category-specific review criteria that validate code changes against critical project rules and security best practices.

To structure feedback for a pull request, deliver clear, actionable insights categorized by severity levels, identifying potential security issues and convention violations before a human reviewer evaluates the changes.

The limitations of automated code review for Nuxt 4 and Vue 3 include its strict focus on security best practices, proper validation, and project-specific convention adherence, which may not capture complex, subjective architectural design flaws.