skills.rest
AlexanderRadevich
AlexanderRadevichCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-review-workflow

Automate structured .NET code reviews using Roslyn MCP tools.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#architecture#quality assurance#code review#.net#roslyn#mcp tools
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AlexanderRadevich/SportowyHub_clientApp --skill code-review-workflow-alexanderradevich
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-workflow
Source: https://github.com/AlexanderRadevich/SportowyHub_clientApp/tree/main/.claude/skills/code-review-workflow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AlexanderRadevich/SportowyHub_clientApp --skill code-review-workflow-alexanderradevich

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates and structures the code review process, ensuring comprehensive analysis of code quality, security, performance, and architectural adherence, thereby reducing manual effort and improving code reliability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-dimensional Analysis: Leverages Roslyn MCP tools for in-depth code examination beyond manual inspection.
  • Structured Reporting: Provides consistent, actionable feedback categorized by severity (Critical, Warning, Suggestion).
  • Use Case: When submitting a Pull Request, this Skill can be invoked to perform a full code review, identifying potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and architectural violations before merging.

Quick Start

Initiate a full code review for the current pull request by stating "review PR".

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-workflow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for .NET projects using Roslyn?▼

This automated code review enforces architectural compliance by performing dependency analysis and identifying anti-patterns in your .NET projects before merging a pull request.

What is the best way to check architectural compliance in a .NET pull request?▼

The best way to check architectural compliance is using an automated code review workflow that performs dependency analysis and identifies anti-patterns, ensuring your codebase adheres to established architectural rules.

Can I use MCP tools to perform a quick code review for minor .NET updates?▼

Yes, you can use MCP tools to perform quick code reviews for minor updates or full pull request reviews for complex changes, providing structured feedback with positive reinforcement and actionable findings.

Does an automated .NET code review workflow support test coverage analysis?▼

Yes, an automated .NET code review workflow supports test coverage analysis alongside checks for correctness, security, performance, and architectural adherence to ensure comprehensive code reliability.

How do I structure code review feedback to be actionable for developers?▼

You structure code review feedback to be actionable by categorizing findings by severity into Critical, Warning, and Suggestion levels, providing consistent reports that highlight both improvements and positive reinforcement.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
tomada1114tomada1114
4

bootstrapping-claudecode

Guide interactive Claude Code setup with templates, agents, and CLAUDE.md configurations.

Community
Advanced
s3nex-coms3nex-com

pr-merge-orchestrator

Coordinate pull request lifecycle from review through merge with mandatory gates.

Community
Advanced
albertoiruruetaalbertoirurueta

dotnet-code-quality

Run Roslyn analyzers on .NET/C# projects and generate SARIF logs.

Community
Advanced
icartshicartsh
4

code-analyze

Analyze .NET solutions for code quality, security, and dependency issues.

Community
Advanced