What problem does it solve?
Code reviews often miss subtle correctness, security, performance, and architecture issues because they rely on manual scanning and inconsistent checklists, which increases merge risk and tech debt.
Core Features & Use Cases
- MCP-first analysis: Runs Roslyn MCP tools (antipattern detection, compiler diagnostics, public API inspection, reference blast radius, and project graph evaluation) before reading source files for context.
- Consistent, severity-based reporting: Produces a structured review with clearly separated Critical, Warning, and Suggestion findings to keep attention on what must be fixed.
- Coverage and architecture guardrails: Checks blast radius via references and validates dependency direction and module boundaries via project graphs and circular dependency detection.
- Use Cases: PR reviews for .NET/C# changes (feature work, refactors), quick bug-fix reviews, and standalone architecture compliance checks for new modules or structural changes.
Quick Start
Ask the AI to run the code-review-workflow for your pull request by saying: Review my PR and include Critical, Warnings, Suggestions, Architecture Compliance, and Test Coverage.