code-review

Automate systematic code review into rubric-based findings and recommendations.

Updated Jan 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xjiang77/agent-wisp --skill code-review-xjiang77
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/xjiang77/agent-wisp/tree/main/tools/setup-toolkit/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xjiang77/agent-wisp --skill code-review-xjiang77

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Systematic, structured code reviews are time-consuming and prone to inconsistent findings. This skill automates the review process to produce repeatable, rubric-based assessments across key quality dimensions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured findings across correctness, security, performance, readability, and architecture.
  • Works on PR diffs, modified files, or entire repositories to surface issues early.
  • Provides actionable recommendations and traceable rationale for each finding.

Quick Start

Provide a structured code-review report for a given PR or set of changed files.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a pull request?

Automate code review for a pull request by applying a systematic rubric that evaluates correctness, security, performance, readability, and architecture. This process analyzes PR diffs or modified files to produce structured, actionable findings for developers.

What is the best way to check codebase security and performance issues early?

Checking codebase security and performance issues early requires running structured code reviews across entire repositories or modified files. This surfaces vulnerabilities and bottlenecks by compiling findings into a deterministic rubric with traceable rationale.

Can I review an entire repository or only specific modified files?

Yes, you can review an entire repository or specific modified files. The structured code review skill works across PR diffs, modified files, and whole codebases to surface issues early and deliver actionable recommendations.

How does static analysis fit into a structured code review process?

Static analysis fits into a structured code review process by providing the baseline data for evaluating correctness, security, and performance. The review then compiles these static-analysis findings into a deterministic rubric to deliver actionable recommendations.

What dimensions does an automated code review cover?

An automated code review covers five core dimensions: correctness, security, performance, readability, and architecture. It evaluates modified files or entire codebases against a deterministic rubric to generate structured, actionable findings.