code-reviewer

Generate structured PR feedback with categorized issues and guidance.

Updated Feb 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Agentic-Assets/Agent-Skills --skill code-reviewer-agentic-assets
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Agentic-Assets/Agent-Skills/tree/main/skills/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Agentic-Assets/Agent-Skills --skill code-reviewer-agentic-assets

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables thorough, constructive code reviews to improve correctness, security, performance, and maintainability by providing structured, actionable feedback and guidance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Provides PR review guidance across languages and architectures
  • Delivers actionable feedback with checklists, templates, and references
  • Helps identify security vulnerabilities, design issues, and refactoring opportunities

Quick Start

Review the given pull request and generate a structured, actionable feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I provide structured pull request feedback for code quality and security?

To provide structured pull request feedback, identify and categorize issues by severity (critical, major, minor) to improve code quality, security, and maintainability. This approach delivers actionable feedback using standardized templates and reference materials.

What is the best way to conduct a code review across different programming languages?

The best way to conduct a code review across languages is to apply architecture-agnostic design critiques, bug hunts, and performance considerations. This ensures consistent, actionable feedback regardless of the specific programming language or framework used.

Can I use automated PR review templates to identify security vulnerabilities?

Yes, you can use PR review templates to identify security vulnerabilities and design issues. These templates standardize the review process, helping generate actionable feedback and uncover refactoring opportunities for improved maintainability.

How do I categorize code review issues by severity during a pull request?

Categorize code review issues by severity—critical, major, and minor—to prioritize security and quality fixes effectively. This standardized output structure ensures developers receive actionable, prioritized feedback for their pull requests.

When do I need to include performance considerations in my PR feedback?

Include performance considerations in PR feedback when evaluating design issues and refactoring opportunities across architectures. Addressing performance alongside security and maintainability ensures comprehensive, actionable feedback for the developer.