code-reviewer

Automate code review for SOLID and architecture violations by applying multi-file checks across pull requests to prevent boundary violations. This process evaluates correctness and maintainability while running in parallel with security agents to provide structured, prioritized feedback.

Enforce test quality and coverage standards by emphasizing acceptance criteria validation during pull request reviews. This approach ensures tests are evaluated against consistent criteria using template-driven guidance, generating a prioritized feedback report on non-security risks.

Template-driven guidance works by referencing planning-mds/SOLUTION-PATTERNS.md and review-checklist.md templates to enforce nine consistent evaluation dimensions across multi-file reviews. It emits a structured Code Quality Review Report focused on correctness, naming conventions, and maintainability.

Yes, you can run code quality checks in parallel with a Security agent. This dual-review process surfaces non-security risks early, focusing on architecture boundaries and test coverage, while the Security agent independently handles vulnerability detection.

Yes, this automated code review process supports multi-file evaluations across entire projects. It focuses on architecture boundaries, SOLID principles, naming conventions, and test quality, emitting a structured Code Quality Review Report for engineering teams.

A key limitation is that this code quality check process focuses strictly on non-security risks like architecture and maintainability. It operates as a dual-review process alongside a Security agent, meaning it is not a standalone replacement for comprehensive security vulnerability scanning.