code-reviewer

Automate code reviews against plans and quality standards.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jjjermiah/dot-agents --skill code-reviewer-jjjermiah
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/jjjermiah/dot-agents/tree/main/src/dot-agents/skills/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jjjermiah/dot-agents --skill code-reviewer-jjjermiah

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Manual code reviews are time-consuming and prone to inconsistencies; this skill provides a structured, repeatable process to validate code against plans and standards, ensuring alignment and quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Plan alignment analysis and deviation detection
  • Comprehensive code quality assessment across files and tests
  • Architecture and design review with SOLID and separation of concerns checks
  • Documentation and standards verification
  • Issue identification with prioritized, actionable recommendations
  • Clear communication protocol and review deliverables

Quick Start

Begin code review with the code-reviewer skill and follow the six-step procedure.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize code reviews to catch architecture and quality issues consistently?

Standardize code reviews by applying a structured, repeatable six-step procedure that enforces plan alignment, code quality, architecture, and test coverage checks. This process guides reviewers through standardized checklists to ensure consistent validation against plans and quality standards.

What is the best way to automate pull request reviews for feature development workflows?

Automate pull request reviews by applying a structured review procedure that identifies issues fast and generates prioritized, actionable recommendations. It supports documentation and communication protocols to validate feature development workflows against plans and quality standards.

Can I check SOLID principles and separation of concerns during a code review?

Checking SOLID principles and separation of concerns is supported during the architecture and design review step. The review process evaluates design compliance alongside code quality, test coverage, and plan alignment to output actionable recommendations.

Does the code review process require referencing standardized checklists?

Referencing standardized checklists is required to enforce plan alignment, code quality, architecture, and test coverage checks. The six-step procedure mandates checklist usage to maintain consistency, verify documentation, and identify issues with prioritized recommendations.

How do I detect plan deviations in feature development before a release validation?

Detect plan deviations in feature development by performing plan alignment analysis during the review process. The procedure validates code against original plans and quality standards, verifying documentation and identifying deviations before release validation outputs actionable recommendations.