code-reviewer

Generate structured code review reports with categorized findings and security checks.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jsdfhasuh/emosonic --skill code-reviewer-jsdfhasuh
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/jsdfhasuh/emosonic/tree/main/.agents/skills/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jsdfhasuh/emosonic --skill code-reviewer-jsdfhasuh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams catch correctness, security, performance, and maintainability problems early by producing structured, actionable code review feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • PR and code quality reviews: Review architecture, logic, and implementation details with a senior-engineer checklist.
  • Security vulnerability identification: Explicitly checks for security issues (e.g., OWASP Top 10 concerns) and unsafe patterns.
  • Test and quality assurance assessment: Evaluates test coverage, edge cases, and the quality of verification.
  • Clear prioritization and reporting: Produces categorized findings (critical → minor) plus positive reinforcement, questions, and a verdict.

Quick Start

Use the code-reviewer skill to review the pull request described in your message and return a prioritized report with critical issues, major issues, minor issues, positives, and questions for the author.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured code review report for a pull request?

To generate a structured code review report, submit your pull request details to receive categorized feedback. The review assesses correctness, security, performance, and maintainability, outputting a summary, verdict, and questions for the author.

What is the best way to identify security vulnerabilities before merging code?

The best way to identify security vulnerabilities is using an automated review checklist that explicitly checks for OWASP Top 10 concerns and unsafe patterns. It categorizes these security issues as critical or major findings to prevent vulnerable code from merging.

How do you evaluate test coverage and edge cases during a code quality audit?

Evaluating test coverage during a code quality audit involves assessing the quality of verification and checking for edge cases. The review applies a senior-engineer checklist to ensure tests adequately cover logic and implementation details before merge.

Can I get actionable feedback on architecture and maintainability for my codebase?

Yes, you can get actionable feedback on architecture and maintainability by requesting a refactoring assessment. The review prioritizes findings into critical, major, and minor categories, providing clear steps to improve structural quality.

Does the code review process include positive reinforcement and questions for the author?

Yes, the code review process includes positive reinforcement and questions for the author alongside categorized findings. This ensures a balanced report that highlights correct logic and architecture while addressing critical areas needing clarification.