code-reviewer

Review pull requests for security issues and actionable code improvements.

Updated Feb 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lamb92009/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer-lamb92009
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/lamb92009/claude-skills/tree/main/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lamb92009/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer-lamb92009

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews can be lengthy, inconsistent, and error-prone, leading to missed defects and security gaps. This Skill provides a disciplined, repeatable review workflow to improve correctness, security, and maintainability across PRs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured evaluation of PR context, architecture, style, tests, and security findings.
  • Actionable feedback with clear priorities and concrete examples to help developers improve quickly.
  • Reference-guided checks and templates to enforce quality standards during reviews.

Quick Start

Review a PR using the code-reviewer workflow and generate a concise, actionable report with clear next steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I improve code quality and consistency in my pull request reviews?

Improve code quality in pull request reviews by applying a structured workflow that evaluates context, architecture, tests, and security. This provides actionable feedback with clear priorities and reference-guided checks to enforce maintainability standards.

How can I detect security issues during a PR review?

Detect security issues during a PR review by running security audits integrated into the evaluation workflow. This identifies vulnerabilities and provides traceable, actionable recommendations to close security gaps before merging.

What is the best way to identify refactoring opportunities in a pull request?

Identify refactoring opportunities in a pull request by evaluating architectural decisions and code structure. The review workflow highlights areas for improvement and provides concrete examples to guide refactoring efforts.

Does this code review workflow support multiple programming languages and architectures?

Yes, the code review workflow supports PR reviews across multiple languages and architectures. It applies consistent code-quality standards and structured feedback templates regardless of the specific tech stack.

Why are my code reviews taking so long and missing defects?

Code reviews often take long and miss defects due to a lack of structured evaluation. Applying a repeatable review workflow with reference-guided checks ensures consistent detection of security issues and maintainability gaps.

Can I generate a structured report with actionable feedback after reviewing a PR?

Yes, you can generate a concise, actionable report after reviewing a PR. The workflow outputs structured feedback with clear next steps and priorities, ensuring traceable recommendations for developers.