Review code for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.
npx skills add https://github.com/mamamou/ai-coding-skills --skill code-reviewer-mamamou
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-reviewer Source: https://github.com/mamamou/ai-coding-skills/tree/main/code-reviewer Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mamamou/ai-coding-skills --skill code-reviewer-mamamou
Conducts structured, senior-level code reviews with categorized, actionable feedback — and fixes issues before presenting output to the user. Trigger when user says "review this code", "check my PR", "look over this function", "give me feedback on this implementation", "audit this before deploy", "simplify this", or "review these changes". Covers correctness, security (OWASP 2025), performance, maintainability, DRY violations, test coverage, and technical debt. The review loop runs before output is shown — the user receives the second draft, not the first. Produces output with blocking issues clearly separated from suggestions. Do NOT trigger for architecture-only discussions (use architect-reviewer) or security-only audits (use security-auditor).
Submit the code or PR you want reviewed and say one of the trigger phrases to initiate the structured review.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To get actionable code review feedback, submit your PR or code snippet and use a trigger phrase like "review this code". The review runs a context-aware loop internally, delivering a second draft that separates blocking issues from general suggestions.
Yes, structured code review checks for OWASP 2025 security vulnerabilities. It audits pull requests and modules to identify security flaws, performance bottlenecks, and maintainability issues across different languages and software stacks.
You can use this code review approach across languages and stacks. It provides senior-level feedback on correctness, DRY violations, test coverage, and technical debt without requiring specific framework dependencies or component installations.
In this code review, blocking issues are critical flaws that must be fixed before deployment, while suggestions are improvements for maintainability and performance. The output clearly separates them to enable quick fixes and safe iterations.
Use an automated code reviewer for broad PR feedback covering correctness, performance, and maintainability. Choose a security-only audit when you specifically need to evaluate vulnerabilities without general code structure or DRY violation analysis.
To trigger a code review for a specific function, submit the code and say "look over this function" or "give me feedback on this implementation". The system then audits the code for technical debt and performance issues.
SuperlendAnalyze code diffs for security risks and generate markdown audit reports.
atmigtncaAnalyze code changes in a git range and produce prioritized review feedback.
dariomazzitellireplik-coderAutomate Spec-Driven Development reviews with parallel code, security, architecture, and performance checks.
inbharataiAnalyzes code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and style violations.
