Orchestrate a parallel four-reviewer code review workflow on PR diffs.
npx skills add https://github.com/mattstruble/skills --skill code-reviewer-mattstruble
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: code-reviewer Source: https://github.com/mattstruble/skills/tree/main/code-reviewer Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mattstruble/skills --skill code-reviewer-mattstruble
This Skill orchestrates a four-reviewer code review pipeline. Spawn all four specialized reviewers in parallel, aggregate their findings, drive the fix cycle, and report results. The skill covers two entry points: manual review (user-driven) and automated post-implementation review (coder-driven).
Provide a PR diff or inline diff to initiate the four-reviewer pipeline and begin automatic orchestration.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To automate code review for a PR diff, provide the diff to initiate a parallel four-reviewer pipeline. The system spawns all four specialized reviewers simultaneously, aggregates their findings, and consolidates the feedback into a structured report.
Yes, you can run parallel code reviews to accelerate PR feedback. The orchestration pipeline spawns four specialized reviewers concurrently, aggregating their findings to provide simultaneous expert evaluation rather than sequential manual checks.
The four-reviewer code review cycle handles blocking findings by aggregating them alongside non-blocking issues, driving a fix cycle capped by a review limit, and performing a final convergence sweep to ensure all critical issues are resolved.
The best way to structure automated post-implementation code checks is using a coordinated review loop. This workflow supports automated entry points, spawns four expert reviewers in parallel, and produces a consolidated report of blocking and non-blocking findings.
Yes, the parallel code review workflow supports both manual and automated entry points. You can initiate a user-driven manual review by providing an inline or PR diff, or trigger it automatically after implementation.
You should use an orchestrated code review pipeline when you need to accelerate structured feedback on PRs. It enforces a review cycle cap and final sweep, ensuring comprehensive parallel expert evaluation that manual sequential reviews often miss.
jlawsCategorize PR reviewer comments, implement fixes, and reply inline via GitHub CLI.
Varuas37Verify specifications against test results using the spec-test tool.
sommioOrchestrate multi-agent code reviews and merge findings into a single report.
DataDogOrchestrate iterative GitHub Pull Request review-fix loops with CI test fixing.
