code-reviewer

Name: code-reviewer
Availability: InStock
Author: motwakorb

Automate pull request reviews across languages with enforced coding standards.

2|Updated Apr 19, 2026

Search Tags:#security #maintainability #coding-standards #code-review #api-design #style-guide #test-quality

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/MotWakorb/claude-agent-dev-team --skill code-reviewer-motwakorb

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/MotWakorb/claude-agent-dev-team/tree/main/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MotWakorb/claude-agent-dev-team --skill code-reviewer-motwakorb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviewers often rely on ad-hoc judgments, leading to inconsistent quality and missed guarantees around correctness, test quality, and API design. The Code Reviewer skill establishes authority over coding standards, maintains a living style guide, and provides mentoring to uplift the entire team's review discipline.

Core Features & Use Cases

Mentoring-first reviews that explain the reasoning behind patterns and promote learning.
Maintains the living style guide and API contract conventions to keep projects coherent.
Blocks merges when style, correctness, test quality, or security issues are detected, with escalation paths to resolve disagreements.
Guides PR reviews across languages and tech stacks, ensuring coverage for testing, security, performance, and maintainability.

Quick Start

Ask the code-reviewer to perform a thorough PR review before merging and enforce the living style guide.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate pull request reviews for coding standards and security?▼

Automating pull request reviews involves enforcing a living style guide to check test quality, correctness, security, and API design. This skills applies mentoring-first reviews across languages to block merges when criteria are not met.

What is the best way to enforce a consistent style guide across multiple programming languages?▼

Enforcing a consistent style guide requires codifying API contract conventions and maintaining a living document. This approach guides PR reviews across tech stacks to ensure maintainability and coherent project standards.

How does a mentoring-first code review process improve software quality?▼

A mentoring-first code review process improves software quality by explaining the reasoning behind patterns to promote learning. It shifts from ad-hoc judgments to rigorous checks on test quality, security, and maintainability.

Can I block merges automatically when code review criteria are not met?▼

Yes, you can block merges when style, correctness, test quality, or security issues are detected. The process includes established escalation paths to resolve disagreements while maintaining software quality.

Why do ad-hoc code reviews lead to inconsistent software quality?▼

Ad-hoc code reviews lead to inconsistent software quality because they rely on individual judgments, missing guarantees around correctness, test quality, and API design. Establishing authority over coding standards resolves this.

Does this automated code review work with any tech stack?▼

Yes, the automated code review guides PR reviews across languages and tech stacks, ensuring coverage for testing, security, performance, and maintainability regardless of the specific framework.