code-reviewer

Automate PR code review with complexity, risk, and SOLID quality checks.

Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Patasse97/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer-patasse97
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Patasse97/claude-skills/tree/main/engineering-team/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Patasse97/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer-patasse97

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

PR code reviews are time-consuming and error-prone; this Skill automates analysis, quality checks, and reporting to accelerate feedback and standardize reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • PR complexity and risk analysis across TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, and Kotlin.
  • Code quality checks for SOLID violations and code smells with generated review reports.
  • Actionable, prioritized review items and a structured verdict to streamline approvals or changes.

Quick Start

Run automated PR analysis and quality checks on a repository and generate a ready-to-use review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate PR code reviews for TypeScript and Python pull requests?

You can automate PR code reviews by running automated analysis that checks complexity, risk, and code quality across TypeScript and Python, generating a structured review report to accelerate feedback.

What is the best way to check pull requests for SOLID violations and code smells?

Checking pull requests for SOLID violations and code smells requires automated code-quality analysis that detects architectural issues and generates prioritized, actionable review items for developers.

Can I use automated diff analysis for repositories with Go, Swift, and Kotlin code?

Yes, automated diff analysis and risk assessment support repositories containing Go, Swift, and Kotlin code, enabling consistent quality checks across multiple programming languages.

How does PR risk assessment work for evaluating pull request complexity?

PR risk assessment evaluates complexity by orchestrating diff analysis to identify high-risk changes, enforcing quality standards, and producing a structured verdict to streamline approvals.

Does automated code review generate actionable reports for developers?

Automated code review generates reports containing prioritized, actionable review items and a final verdict, standardizing the review process and highlighting necessary changes before merging.

What are the limitations of automating code reviews with risk assessment?

Automating code reviews provides risk assessment and quality checks but requires human judgment for final approval, as automated reports focus on structural complexity and standard violations rather than business logic.