code-reviewer

Identify and prioritize security, performance, and maintainability issues during code reviews.

71|18|Updated Mar 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Science-Discovery/Aether --skill code-reviewer-science-discovery
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Science-Discovery/Aether/tree/main/.opencode/skills/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Science-Discovery/Aether --skill code-reviewer-science-discovery

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill streamlines and standardizes code reviews by providing a comprehensive, rule-based framework that surfaces security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and quality issues early in the development lifecycle.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Rule-based evaluation: Identify vulnerabilities, performance issues, and maintainability concerns using a centralized rules catalog.
  • Structured feedback: Generate repeatable, actionable feedback aligned with AGENTS.md guidelines for consistent reviews.
  • Use cases: During pull requests, security audits, and formal code-quality checks across software projects.

Quick Start

Review a pull request with the included AGENTS.md rules to identify and categorize issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform structured code reviews to catch security and performance issues early?

Structured code reviews identify and prioritize security, performance, and maintainability issues using a centralized rules catalog to guide deterministic checks and generate consistent feedback.

How do I standardize pull request feedback for maintainability and security vulnerabilities?

Standardize pull request feedback by applying a rule-based framework that surfaces security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and quality issues early in the development lifecycle.

What is the best way to automate security audits and code quality assessments across software projects?

The best way to automate security audits is using rule-based evaluation with a centralized rules catalog to generate repeatable, actionable feedback aligned with standard guidelines.

Can I use a rules catalog to guide deterministic checks during formal code-quality checks?

Yes, you can use a rules catalog during formal code-quality checks to identify and categorize vulnerabilities, performance issues, and maintainability concerns across software projects.

Does rule-based code review work for evaluating performance bottlenecks and maintainability concerns?

Rule-based code review works effectively for evaluating performance bottlenecks and maintainability concerns by applying deterministic checks to generate consistent, structured feedback.