code-reviewer-skill

Coordinate structured code reviews with preflight checks and standardized feedback.

1|1|Updated Mar 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zzafergok/skills --skill code-reviewer-skill-zzafergok
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer-skill
Source: https://github.com/zzafergok/skills/tree/main/08-engineering-quality/code-reviewer-skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zzafergok/skills --skill code-reviewer-skill-zzafergok

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a disciplined, repeatable approach to requesting and receiving code reviews, reducing miscommunication and accelerating PR readiness by guiding both sides through a clear workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured review request workflow to ensure consistent expectations for what to review and when.
  • Preflight checks (type-check, lint, i18n parity) and evidence-based evaluation criteria to catch issues early.
  • Standardized feedback format and response process to close loops quickly and reproducibly.
  • Ideal for preparing PRs, reviewing teammates' changes, and handling feedback across major features, bug fixes, and refactors.

Quick Start

Prepare your changes, push the feature branch, and request a review using the standardized subject line and commit-range guidance.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer-skill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a pull request review to ensure consistent quality?

To structure a pull request review, apply a formal workflow that enforces preflight checks like type-check, lint, and locales parity, alongside evidence-based evaluation criteria to catch issues early and reduce miscommunication.

What preflight checks should I run before requesting a code review?

Before requesting a code review, run preflight checks for type-checking, linting, and locales parity to ensure your feature branch meets baseline standards and accelerates PR readiness.

How does an evidence-based evaluation framework work for code reviews?

An evidence-based evaluation framework for code reviews works by applying standardized feedback and response processes, ensuring all review comments are backed by concrete evidence to close loops quickly and reproducibly.

Can I use a standardized review workflow for major refactors and bug fixes?

Yes, you can use a standardized review workflow for major refactors and bug fixes to handle feedback consistently, evaluate impact across features, and guide both sides through a clear, repeatable process.

What is the best way to handle feedback and close loops during a code review?

The best way to handle feedback is to use a standardized feedback format and response process, which helps close loops quickly, maintain consistency, and reduce miscommunication between reviewers and authors.