code-security-review

Identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities in source code across programming languages.

23|4|Updated Feb 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ez-lbz/claude-code-security-skills --skill code-security-review-ez-lbz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-security-review
Source: https://github.com/ez-lbz/claude-code-security-skills/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ez-lbz/claude-code-security-skills --skill code-security-review-ez-lbz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automated, focused security reviews reduce the manual effort required to identify real vulnerabilities in codebases by prioritizing high-confidence findings and filtering noise. It helps engineering teams shift from broad, noisy scans to actionable risk insights during code reviews and pull requests.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase-driven analysis across codebases and languages.
  • Three-phase audit-filter-report workflow with customizable categories and rules.
  • Generates prioritized findings suitable for integration into CI/CD or human review.

Quick Start

Audit the provided codebase for high-confidence vulnerabilities and return a prioritized, actionable report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-security-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities in source code across multiple programming languages?

Identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities using a three-phase audit-filter-report workflow that applies customizable categories and filtering rules across programming languages. It filters noise and returns prioritized findings for code reviews or pull requests.

How does the three-phase audit-filter-report workflow function for automated security reviews?

The audit-filter-report workflow functions by first auditing source code context, then applying hard exclusion patterns and filtering rules to remove false positives, and finally generating a prioritized vulnerability report suitable for code reviews or pull requests.

Can I customize vulnerability filtering rules to target specific security categories in my codebase?

Yes, you can customize vulnerability filtering rules to target specific security categories in your codebase. The skill includes a customization guide and filtering rules that enable targeted vulnerability discovery and prioritized reporting based on your specific requirements.

What is the best way to integrate automated vulnerability discovery into CI/CD pipelines or pull requests?

The best way to integrate automated vulnerability discovery into CI/CD pipelines or pull requests is to use a skill that generates prioritized findings suitable for human review. This phase-driven analysis shifts broad scans into actionable risk insights directly within your code review process.

Does automated security code review work across different programming languages without language-specific rules?

Automated security code review works across different programming languages without requiring language-specific rules by applying a generalized three-phase audit-filter-report workflow. It identifies exploitable vulnerabilities in practice using customizable categories and hard exclusion patterns.

Why are hard exclusion patterns necessary when auditing source code for security vulnerabilities?

Hard exclusion patterns are necessary when auditing source code to filter out false positives and noise. By applying these patterns during the filtering phase, the audit focuses on high-confidence vulnerabilities that could be exploited in practice, ensuring actionable reporting.