codebase-archaeology

Explore unfamiliar codebases from documentation through entry points and data flow.

29|8|Updated Aug 17, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LFDT-Nightstream/Nightstream --skill codebase-archaeology-lfdt-nightstream
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codebase-archaeology
Source: https://github.com/LFDT-Nightstream/Nightstream/tree/main/.agents/skills/codebase-archaelogy
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LFDT-Nightstream/Nightstream --skill codebase-archaeology-lfdt-nightstream

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Codebase-archaeology helps you stop guessing and instead build a dependable understanding of an unfamiliar codebase by following a documentation-first, entry-point-to-data-flow approach that produces an architecture-level mental model.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Documentation-first orientation: Starts with AGENTS.md and README.md to capture intended architecture, constraints, and conventions before opening source files.
  • Systematic entry-point mapping: Locates main modules and operational entry points (CLI mains, HTTP routes, etc.) to anchor exploration in the real execution path.
  • Data flow and integration tracing: Uses targeted searches to connect input handling to core types to configuration, external integrations, and test infrastructure.
  • Output-ready architecture synthesis: Produces a reusable summary you can apply to onboarding, feature work, or debugging without rereading everything later.

Quick Start

Ask the AI: Explore the Nightstream repository to produce a comprehensive technical architecture summary by reading AGENTS.md and README.md first, then tracing entry points and key data flow through the src directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about codebase-archaeology

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I understand an unfamiliar codebase without randomly reading files?

To understand an unfamiliar codebase, start with documentation-first orientation by reading AGENTS.md and README.md to capture intended architecture, then systematically map entry points like CLI mains or HTTP routes to anchor exploration in real execution paths instead of random file reading.

What is the best way to build a mental model of a legacy codebase for feature work?

The best way to build a mental model of a legacy codebase is to trace data flow from entry points through module structure, core types, configuration surfaces, and external integrations, producing a reusable architecture summary you can apply to feature work without rereading everything later.

How does data flow tracing work when exploring an unknown architecture?

Data flow tracing works by using targeted searches to connect input handling to core types, configuration surfaces, external integrations, and test infrastructure, allowing you to map the real execution path from operational entry points through the module structure.

Can I use this approach for onboarding and debugging, or is it only for initial codebase exploration?

You can use this codebase exploration approach for onboarding, legacy understanding, feature addition, and debugging. It produces an output-ready architecture synthesis that applies to any scenario where you need architecture clarity without random file reading.

Do I need any specific dependencies or tools to map codebase architecture systematically?

No external dependencies are required to map codebase architecture systematically. The approach uses provided reference search patterns and an exploration workflow to discover entry points, core types, configuration surfaces, integration points, and test infrastructure natively.

What are the limitations of a documentation-first codebase exploration approach?

A documentation-first codebase exploration approach is limited when AGENTS.md or README.md files are outdated or missing, requiring you to rely more heavily on entry-point mapping and targeted data flow searches to infer the intended architecture and module structure.