codebase-consistency-reviewer

You can check a pull request for code duplication and inconsistent naming by triggering an automated consistency review on the diff. This analyzes the PR to identify reinvented wheels, duplicated functionality, and deviations from codebase conventions.

Yes, you can run consistency reviews across multiple programming languages like Go, C++, and TypeScript. The review process is language-agnostic and supports analyzing diffs for duplication and convention issues across diverse codebases.

To automatically trigger a consistency review, use the command 'codebase-consistency-reviewer review-for-duplication PR-123'. It also activates when it detects phrases like 'review for duplication' or 'does this match our conventions' in your workflow.

Codebase consistency review is the automated analysis of commits and diffs to detect duplicated functionality and inconsistent patterns. You need it during code reviews to ensure new code adheres to existing coding standards and avoids reinventing existing solutions.

To analyze a commit diff for reinvented wheels, you need to provide access to your codebase and the relevant diff information. The review uses this input to detect duplicated functionality and verify adherence to your coding standards.

Yes, automated duplication detection works for user-facing convention checks. It analyzes your codebase commits and diffs to identify inconsistencies in both internal codebase patterns and user-facing conventions across multiple languages.