codebase-review

Audit codebases with parallel agents to identify security, performance, and architectural issues.

1|Updated Apr 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/owebboy/maestro --skill codebase-review-owebboy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codebase-review
Source: https://github.com/owebboy/maestro/tree/main/skills/codebase-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/owebboy/maestro --skill codebase-review-owebboy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the difficulty of maintaining codebase quality by automating a deep, multi-dimensional audit that identifies security, performance, architectural, and testing issues across an entire repository.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel Multi-Agent Analysis: Simultaneously runs six specialized agents to evaluate security, performance, architecture, testing, data integrity, and UX.
  • Verified Findings: Implements a two-wave process where findings are audited for accuracy, effectively eliminating false positives.
  • Actionable Triage: Automatically captures confirmed findings into a local work-item store for immediate project management and resolution.

Quick Start

Invoke the codebase-review skill to perform a full audit of the current directory and capture all verified findings for triage.

Frequently Asked Questions about codebase-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a comprehensive codebase health audit for technical debt and security vulnerabilities?

A comprehensive codebase health audit runs six parallel specialized agents to evaluate security, performance, architecture, testing, data integrity, and UX, then captures verified findings into a local work-item store for triage.

What is the best way to automate security audits and performance bottleneck identification across a large repository?

Automating security audits and performance bottleneck identification uses a two-wave multi-agent process where specialized agents run in parallel, followed by an audit phase that verifies findings to eliminate false positives before triage.

Can I use parallel subagents to review codebase architecture and identify flaws in diverse software projects?

Yes, you can use parallel subagent execution capabilities to process codebase architecture review findings across diverse software projects, verifying accuracy through dedicated audit phases before generating actionable work items.

Does this multi-agent static analysis approach eliminate false positives in code review and security audits?

This multi-agent static analysis approach implements a two-wave verification process where initial findings are audited for accuracy in a second phase, effectively eliminating false positives before capturing confirmed issues for triage.

How do I capture and triage confirmed security vulnerabilities and architectural flaws found during a code review?

After multi-agent code review identifies and verifies security vulnerabilities and architectural flaws, the system automatically captures confirmed findings into a local work-item store for immediate project management and resolution.

What dimensions does a multi-agent codebase review evaluate beyond security and performance?

A multi-agent codebase review evaluates six dimensions simultaneously: security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, architectural flaws, testing issues, data integrity, and UX, providing comprehensive repository health coverage.