codex-deepseek-paper-protocol

Academic manuscript revision uses a two-agent workflow where one agent plans, reviews, and integrates while the other drafts and revises text. This separation keeps prose authorship distinct from protocol control, applying structured feedback until acceptance checks pass or rounds reach their limit.

DeepSeek drafts paper sections while a companion style review mechanism checks clarity, evidence, terminology, and unsupported claims. The planner agent delegates writing tasks, reviews the returned text, and requests bounded revisions until the prose meets structured acceptance criteria.

A two-agent academic writing workflow assigns planning and reviewing roles to one agent and drafting or revising roles to another. It manages bounded review cycles, applies style and safety oversight, and ensures supported claims, consistency, and format before accepting the revised manuscript text.

The paper protocol requires companion skills for DeepSeek execution and style review to function. These dependencies provide the actual manuscript text generation and the stylistic oversight needed to verify evidence, terminology, and unsupported claims during the bounded revision loops.

Bounded review cycles for manuscript text revisions are managed by setting a round limit and applying structured acceptance checks. The reviewing agent evaluates the drafted text for consistency and supported claims, requesting further revisions until the prose is ready or the limit is reached.

Multi-agent manuscript workflows are not ideal when a task requires direct prose authorship without protocol control or bounded review loops. Tasks needing unbounded creative iteration or lacking clear role separation between drafting and reviewing will not benefit from this structured revision process.