Review code diffs with OpenAI Codex CLI and output a gate verdict.
npx skills add https://github.com/filipnyquist/caidos --skill codex-filipnyquist
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: codex Source: https://github.com/filipnyquist/caidos/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/codex Command: npx skills add https://github.com/filipnyquist/caidos --skill codex-filipnyquist
Provides an independent, blunt second opinion on code changes to catch issues that slip through standard reviews.
Run /codex to get an independent second opinion on your latest changes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To get an independent second opinion on code changes, you can run a review against your diffs to enforce gate-style verdicts and catch issues that standard reviews miss.
You can probe edge cases and robustness in a code review by using adversarial challenge prompts to aggressively test your code changes and uncover hidden vulnerabilities.
Yes, you can ask an AI assistant to explain or reason about design decisions using consult prompts, which provide session continuity for follow-up questions.
Standard code review runs against diffs to enforce gate-style verdicts, while adversarial challenge mode uses probing prompts to test robustness and expose edge cases.
No, the Codex CLI tool operates independently without requiring external dependencies or components to provide blunt second opinions on your code diffs.
You should use an adversarial code review when standard reviews pass but you need to aggressively probe robustness, expose edge cases, and ensure your code changes hold up under challenging conditions.
daffy0208Automate code review with OpenAI Codex CLI in Git workflows.
robkamIdentify and summarize vulnerabilities, regressions, and coverage gaps in PR code changes.
spallempatiEnforce mandatory peer review and automated quality gates on pull requests.
CHENyiru3Standardize Python code quality with Ruff linting and MyPy type checking.
