codex

Review implementation plans via iterative OpenAI Codex CLI debate rounds.

1|Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nawwwal/dex --skill codex-nawwwal
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codex
Source: https://github.com/nawwwal/dex/tree/main/plugins/tools/skills/codex
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nawwwal/dex --skill codex-nawwwal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Send the current implementation plan to OpenAI Codex for collaborative debate. Claude evaluates each concern, accepts valid feedback, contests debatable points with counter-arguments, and converges only when both sides agree. Max 5 rounds.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Collaborative plan review with OpenAI Codex CLI
  • Iterative rounds with verdicts and plan revisions
  • Structured criteria for correctness, risks, missing steps, alternatives, and security

Quick Start

Prepare the implementation plan and initiate Round 1 of Codex review using the Codex CLI.

Frequently Asked Questions about codex

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use collaborative debate to review an implementation plan?

Collaborative plan review sends your implementation plan to OpenAI Codex CLI for iterative debate, evaluating correctness, risks, and security to converge on a refined plan within five rounds.

Can I use Codex CLI for automated code and plan review in read-only mode?

Yes, Codex CLI supports automated plan review in read-only sandbox mode to safeguard against writes, applying strict verdict flow and plan updates for multi-service coordination and data migrations.

What is the maximum number of rounds for iterative plan review with OpenAI Codex?

Iterative plan review with OpenAI Codex runs for a maximum of five rounds, applying structured criteria for missing steps and alternatives until both sides agree on the final plan.

Do I need a specific model to run Codex CLI for feature planning and security reviews?

You need the Codex CLI and a specified model to run feature planning and security reviews, ensuring iterative rounds evaluate concerns and contest debatable points with counter-arguments.

When should I use an automated plan review instead of manual code review?

Use automated plan review for complex implementation plans involving authentication, data models, and multi-service coordination, where structured criteria and iterative debate can catch missing steps and security risks.

Why does Codex CLI require read-only sandbox mode for plan updates?

Read-only sandbox mode is required to safeguard against unauthorized writes during collaborative debate, ensuring the tool only applies strict verdict flow and plan updates without modifying the underlying codebase.