codex-peer-review

Runs a two-AI peer review workflow using Codex CLI on design plans.

Updated Aug 6, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/fabiano001/claude-config --skill codex-peer-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codex-peer-review
Source: https://github.com/fabiano001/claude-config/tree/main/plugins/marketplaces/agent-peer-review-marketplace/plugins/codex-peer-review/skills/codex-peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fabiano001/claude-config --skill codex-peer-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a rigorous, two-AI peer review workflow to surface design flaws, security concerns, and quality gaps before presenting implementations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured two-AI discussion to validate plans, architecture, and broad technical questions.
  • Subagent-based validation using Codex CLI to ensure context isolation and reproducible results.
  • Escalation support to Perplexity/WebSearch when external authoritative input is required.

Quick Start

Run the Codex peer review workflow on the current design before presenting implementation plans.

Frequently Asked Questions about codex-peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate architecture proposals using AI peer review?

AI peer review validates architecture proposals by using a structured two-AI discussion between Claude and Codex CLI. This subagent workflow surfaces design flaws and security concerns before presenting implementation plans.

What is two-AI design validation and how does it work?

Two-AI design validation works by enforcing a subagent-based peer review workflow between Claude and Codex CLI. It applies focus prompts and multiple discussion rounds to ensure context isolation and reproducible design validation results.

Can I use Codex CLI to review Claude's technical designs?

Yes, Codex CLI reviews Claude's technical designs by acting as a subagent within an isolated workflow. It applies structured focus prompts and discussion rounds to validate architecture proposals and broad technical questions.

When do I need an AI peer review for my code architecture?

You need an AI peer review during design reviews and architecture proposals to reduce risk. It surfaces quality gaps and design flaws before sharing implementation plans, ensuring broad technical questions are thoroughly validated.

How do I handle escalation when AI peer review lacks authoritative input?

Handle escalation by triggering Perplexity or WebSearch when the peer review workflow lacks internal authoritative input. This injects external context into the two-AI discussion to resolve complex design validation issues.