codex-reasoning-rigor

Enforce evidence-backed reasoning with task contracts and repo-grounded analysis.

6|1|Updated Feb 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills --skill codex-reasoning-rigor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codex-reasoning-rigor
Source: https://github.com/Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills/tree/main/skills/codex-reasoning-rigor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills --skill codex-reasoning-rigor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Enforces explicit, evidence-backed reasoning for complex engineering tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Explicit task contracts (goal, constraints, non-goals, evidence, quality bar) to bound work.
  • Repo-grounded reasoning with references to sources, tests, and actual artifacts.
  • Monitoring signals and outcome-oriented delivery with clear exit criteria.

Quick Start

Provide a structured reasoning brief for a complex task that defines goals, evidence requirements, and monitoring signals.

Frequently Asked Questions about codex-reasoning-rigor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce evidence-backed reasoning for complex engineering tasks?

Evidence-backed reasoning is enforced by applying a task-contract framework that defines goals, constraints, non-goals, and required evidence before execution. This ensures decisions are verifiable and grounded in repository artifacts.

What is repo-grounded analysis and when do I need it for architecture decisions?

Repo-grounded analysis validates engineering decisions by referencing actual source code, tests, and artifacts within the repository. It is needed for architecture decisions, refactors, and operational plans requiring strict verifiability and traceability.

How do I structure a task contract for software refactoring and operational plans?

Structure a task contract by explicitly defining the goal, constraints, non-goals, evidence requirements, and quality bar. This bounds the work and provides a formal output contract with clear exit criteria for software refactoring.

Can I use this approach to evaluate multiple decision options for an architecture refactor?

Yes, the approach provides a decision surface that evaluates multiple options for an architecture refactor. It requires monitoring signals and repo-grounded evidence to justify the selected path and ensure outcome-oriented delivery.

Does evidence-based engineering reasoning work without explicit monitoring loops?

No, monitoring loops are integral to evidence-based engineering reasoning. They provide the necessary outcome-oriented delivery signals and clear exit criteria required to verify that the operational plans meet the defined quality bar.