codex-result-handling

Present Codex helper outputs with ordered findings and evidence boundaries.

Updated Apr 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/luiztrilha/dunderia-public --skill codex-result-handling-luiztrilha
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codex-result-handling
Source: https://github.com/luiztrilha/dunderia-public/tree/main/templates/local-runtime-profile/skills/claude-plugins/marketplaces/openai-codex/plugins/codex/skills/codex-result-handling
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/luiztrilha/dunderia-public --skill codex-result-handling-luiztrilha

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Ensures clarity and maintainability in presenting Codex helper outputs back to the user, providing a structured approach to reviewing and understanding the helper's feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Preservation of Structure: Maintains the original structure of the helper's output, including verdicts, summaries, findings, and next steps.
  • Ordered Findings: Presents findings in the order of severity, with detailed information about the code and its issues.
  • Evidence Boundary: Keeps the distinction between inferences, uncertainties, and follow-up questions, preserving the context.
  • Output Sections: Ensures that all sections requested by the prompt, such as observed facts, inferences, open questions, touched files, or next steps, are presented in full.
  • Failure Reporting: Handles failed Codex runs by reporting them directly without attempting to substitute with Claude-side implementations.

Quick Start

When a Codex helper provides output, use the codex-result-handling skill to present the findings and follow-up steps to the user.

Frequently Asked Questions about codex-result-handling

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure Codex helper outputs for clear code review feedback?

Codex helper outputs are structured by preserving original sections like verdicts, summaries, findings, and next steps, while maintaining a clear separation of inferences and uncertainties. This approach ensures detailed, accurate feedback for code review workflows.

What is the best way to present code review findings ordered by severity?

Presenting code review findings ordered by severity involves maintaining the original output structure and providing detailed information about the code and its issues. This structured presentation emphasizes evidence boundaries between inferences and open questions.

How do I keep inferences and uncertainties separated when formatting code review results?

Inferences and uncertainties are kept separated by enforcing an evidence boundary during result presentation. This preserves the context of observed facts, open questions, and follow-up questions alongside touched files and next steps.

How do I handle failed Codex runs during code analysis?

Failed Codex runs are handled by reporting the failures directly without attempting to substitute them with Claude-side implementations. This ensures accurate failure reporting within the code review workflow.

Does Codex result handling work without external dependencies?

Codex result handling works without external dependencies, requiring no components or prior environment setup. It functions directly to format and present the structured feedback from Codex helpers.