skills.rest
isaenter
isaenterCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

codex-review

Coordinates Codex-based adversarial reviews of project plans across multiple rounds.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#templates#codex#review#plan#adversarial#multi-round
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/isaenter/UES-PRO --skill codex-review-isaenter
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codex-review
Source: https://github.com/isaenter/UES-PRO/tree/main/frontend-vben/.claude/skills/codex-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/isaenter/UES-PRO --skill codex-review-isaenter

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables rigorous, multi-round review of project plans by coordinating adversarial prompts with Codex to uncover vulnerabilities, ambiguities, and infeasibilities early in the lifecycle.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated round-based critique: orchestrates plan reviews across multiple Codex iterations using predefined templates.
  • Template-driven verdicts: captures findings, suggested changes, and final verdicts with diffs for traceability.
  • Auditable workflow: maintains a running record of rounds, decisions, and rationale to support continuous improvement.

Quick Start

Generate plan.md, then run codex-review to initiate Round 1 for Codex critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about codex-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate adversarial plan review to find vulnerabilities and infeasibilities?▼

Adversarial plan review automates finding vulnerabilities by orchestrating multi-round Codex critiques against plan documents, generating template-driven verdicts with diffs and issue tracking for iterative refinement.

What is multi-round adversarial plan review and how does it work?▼

Multi-round adversarial plan review applies predefined critique templates to project plans across iterative Codex sessions, capturing findings, suggested changes, and final verdicts to maintain an auditable record of decisions.

How to conduct template-driven project plan critique using Codex?▼

To conduct template-driven critique, generate a plan.md file and run the review process to initiate Round 1, allowing Codex to apply predefined templates that capture findings and suggested changes with traceable diffs.

Can I use codex-review for iterative critique of software development plans?▼

Yes, codex-review applies template-driven adversarial critique to plan documents generated in the P stage across software development contexts, enabling iterative refinement through multiple rounds of structured review.

Does multi-round adversarial review support auditable issue tracking and verdicts?▼

Multi-round adversarial review supports auditable issue tracking by maintaining a running record of rounds, decisions, rationale, and template-driven verdicts with diffs for continuous improvement and traceability.

What are the limitations of automated plan review for software development?▼

Automated plan review depends on having a generated plan document to critique, and while it orchestrates multi-round Codex iterations with template-driven verdicts, it focuses on identifying vulnerabilities and ambiguities rather than generating the initial plan.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
m-xlseam-xlsea
319

codex-review

Perform adversarial multi-round plan reviews with Codex and persist verdicts to Markdown.

Community
Advanced
Atrium-HermesAtrium-Hermes

signal-verdict

Identify trackers lacking citable signals in outward content and flag them for review.

Community
Advanced
synaptiaisynaptiai
4

audit

Record time-stamped actions, tools, and outcomes into a standardized audit_record.

Official
Advanced
VrooliVrooli
54

Swarm Manager Workshop

Generate workshop round specifications with readiness scoring and plan updates.

Official
Advanced