codex

Route code review requests through codex review, second opinions, and adversarial challenges.

Updated Apr 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SakshamKandel/Salt-Route-Consulting- --skill codex-sakshamkandel
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: codex
Source: https://github.com/SakshamKandel/Salt-Route-Consulting-/tree/main/.agents/skills/codex
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SakshamKandel/Salt-Route-Consulting- --skill codex-sakshamkandel

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Codex CLI wrapper helps developers get reliable code reviews, second opinions, and adversarial checks without switching tools.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent diff review with codex review gate
  • Adversarial mode that challenges code
  • Session continuity for follow-up questions
  • Plan-mode aware prompts for predictable behavior

Quick Start

Start a codex review session on the current repository to obtain an automatic pass/fail assessment and follow-up questions.

Frequently Asked Questions about codex

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review and get an independent diff assessment for my repository?

Independent diff review processes repository changes through a codex review gate to generate automatic pass/fail assessments. It evaluates codebases and outputs structured follow-up questions for session continuity.

What is adversarial testing for code and how does it challenge my codebase?

Adversarial testing challenges code by routing coding tasks through adversarial mode prompts. This mechanism applies stress-tests to codebase logic and exposes potential weaknesses during the session-management workflow.

Can I use session continuity to ask follow-up questions after an initial code review?

Session continuity supports follow-up questions after an initial code review by maintaining context across interactions. This session-management feature enables iterative diff reviews and second opinions within the same workspace.

Does the code review workflow support plan-mode aware prompts for predictable behavior?

Plan-mode aware prompts ensure predictable behavior during code reviews by constraining the workflow scope. This safety mechanism applies to codebases and coding tasks, routing requests safely through structured opinion workflows.

What are the limitations of using an AI-assisted wrapper for second opinions on code?

AI-assisted wrappers require YAML frontmatter fields defining name and description to function. Limitations include dependency on supported tools like Bash, Read, Write, Glob, and Grep, and strict adherence to plan-mode for safe execution.