coding-standards

Enforce naming, function, and error handling standards across programming languages.

Updated May 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HyperionBurn/searchv1beta --skill coding-standards-hyperionburn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: coding-standards
Source: https://github.com/HyperionBurn/searchv1beta/tree/main/.github/skills/coding-standards
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HyperionBurn/searchv1beta --skill coding-standards-hyperionburn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It solves inconsistent code style and quality drift across teams and languages by providing a canonical, shareable baseline of naming, structure, error handling, and anti-pattern guidance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Canonical cross-language reference: Provides a single source of truth for reviewer agents to embed and apply consistently.
  • Naming and style guardrails: Enforces conventions for variables, functions, constants, booleans, and collection naming across languages.
  • Function and error handling constraints: Guides maximum length, parameter limits, complexity targets, early-return patterns, and contextual error messaging.
  • Maintainability anti-patterns: Flags high-risk practices like mutable global state, unawaited promises, magic numbers, god objects, and swallowed errors.

Quick Start

Use the coding-standards skill when you need a rules baseline for reviewing style, naming, and maintainability in a code review or modernization task.

Frequently Asked Questions about coding-standards

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce consistent coding standards across multiple programming languages?

A canonical, shareable baseline of naming, structure, error handling, and anti-pattern guidance solves inconsistent code style and quality drift across teams and multi-language repositories by providing a single source of truth.

What anti-patterns should I check for during a cross-language code review?

During a code review, flag high-risk maintainability anti-patterns such as mutable global state, unawaited promises, magic numbers, god objects, and swallowed errors to prevent quality drift across repositories.

Can I use automated reviewer workflows to detect naming convention violations in multi-language repositories?

Yes, automated reviewer workflows can detect naming convention violations by embedding deterministic cross-language guardrails for variables, functions, constants, booleans, and collections within multi-language repositories.

What are the best practices for function length and error handling in code review?

Best practices for function length and error handling involve enforcing maximum length limits, parameter constraints, complexity targets, early-return patterns, and contextual error messaging to guide maintainability.