cognitive-rhythm-writing

Designs pacing and tension in Japanese expository prose through cognitive-mode switching rules.

3|Updated Jul 1, 2016
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shomatan/dotfiles --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-shomatan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agentโ–ผ
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cognitive-rhythm-writing
Source: https://github.com/shomatan/dotfiles/tree/main/dot_claude/skills/cognitive-rhythm-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shomatan/dotfiles --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-shomatan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Dense, information-rich Japanese writing often reads as flat and boring because every sentence is written in the same cognitive mode. This Skill treats pacing not as decoration but as deliberate switching of the reader's cognitive modes (observation, hesitation, assertion, re-observation) and as management of unresolved tension, so articles and explanatory chapters keep readers moving forward. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Rhythm design rules: Defines sentence-level beats (short setup, long flow, short stop), paragraph density waveforms, and alternation between assertion and hesitation. - Tension management: Requires at least one open question or unverified conviction at all times, with explicit recovery of raised questions and a tension ledger check. - Filler detection: Provides a single test (does the sentence update the situation or the document?) to distinguish intentional looseness from meta-commentary filler, plus a five-step mechanical post-writing inspection procedure. - Use Case: Diagnose a technically correct but dull explanatory article, identify missing tension and flat rhythm, and rewrite openings, section entries, and endings accordingly. ## Quick Start Use the cognitive-rhythm-writing skill to review and revise my Japanese article draft so it has varied pacing and sustained tension.

Frequently Asked Questions about cognitive-rhythm-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make dense Japanese explanatory writing less boring?โ–ผ

Flatness comes from writing everything in one cognitive mode, not from information volume. Alternate observation, hesitation, assertion, and re-observation, and keep at least one unresolved question or unverified conviction open so readers always have a reason to continue.

How to create rhythm in Japanese prose without shortening sentences?โ–ผ

Build rhythm with the beat pattern of short setup, long flow, short stop at the paragraph level, and alternate assertion with hesitation. Do not cut necessary context for brevity, since removing shared context creates gaps rather than pacing.

What is the difference between intentional looseness and filler sentences?โ–ผ

Apply one test: does the sentence update the situation or the document? Sentences conveying events, data, or the narrator's judgment state are acceptable looseness. Sentences only describing the text itself, such as progress announcements, are filler and should be deleted.

When should theory or concepts be introduced in an explanatory article?โ–ผ

Introduce theory only after creating a nameless discomfort in the reader, using a counter-question or confession at the section opening. Presenting theory first and confirming with examples afterward robs readers of the discovery experience.

What are the limitations of this writing method?โ–ผ

The rules target expository Japanese prose meant to be read as a narrative, not reference documentation or terse technical specs. Material for rhythm and tension must come from the subject matter itself; where none exists, the text stays flat rather than adding meta-commentary.