coherence-reviewer

To check a planning document for internal contradictions, review the text to identify and report conflicting statements across sections, terminology drift, and structural issues to improve overall coherence.

Terminology drift in architecture documents occurs when inconsistent naming or defined terms are used across different sections. You can spot it by reviewing the document to highlight ambiguous terms and flag where naming conventions diverge.

Finding unresolved cross-references in planning docs requires detecting forward references, identifying undefined sections, and mapping cross-reference gaps. This structural issue detection ensures readers do not encounter broken or ambiguous links.

Yes, you can apply coherence review to planning and architecture documents across teams. The analysis scales to flag ambiguous terms, unresolved cross-references, and conflicting statements in collaborative, multi-team planning environments.

The best way to report document inconsistencies before approval is to generate structured findings that address contradictions, terminology drift, and structural gaps, paired with clear remediation recommendations for the team.

Readers diverge when planning documents contain ambiguous terms and unresolved cross-references because the lack of internal consistency creates multiple valid interpretations. Detecting these structural issues prevents misaligned understanding across teams.