What problem does it solve? Agents that produce work often miss their own defects because they carry too much context, own the implementation, or are biased toward their own choices. This Skill runs an independent review of actual artifacts using fresh reviewer agents, so issues surface that the original agent cannot see. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Fresh-context reviewer agents: Spawns 1-3 reviewers based on work scope (narrow, medium, broad), each assigned a distinct lens such as correctness, security, accessibility, or executability. - Evidence-based findings with self-verification: Every finding requires evidence from source files, and load-bearing findings are re-opened and re-checked at synthesis before the report is returned. - Structured scoring and verdicts: Findings are classified as Critical, Major, Minor, or Interesting, with a 0-100 score mapped to verdict thresholds from clean to blocked. - Use Case: After implementing a multi-file backend change, run a cold review to have independent reviewers check correctness, security, and test coverage against the original objectives before merging. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to cold review the current diff against the original objectives and return a scored report with evidence-backed findings.