commit-work

To write conventional commits for split logical changes, inspect the working tree to identify boundaries, stage only the relevant hunks, and draft a structured message. This enforces a stepwise workflow to maintain a clear project history.

The best way to stage only intended changes for a git commit is to inspect the working tree for logical boundaries and selectively stage specific hunks. This ensures only the next commit is included and changes are safe to ship.

A conventional commit workflow handles multi-commit reviews by applying a repeatable, auditable process. It guides you through inspecting changes, staging relevant hunks, and validating changes with a checklist before committing each logical unit.

Yes, you can use this commit workflow without installing external dependencies. It operates independently to guide review, staging, and structured message drafting using Conventional Commits standards.

You should use conventional commits instead of plain git commit messages to make commits easy to review and safe to ship. Structured messages logically scope changes and describe what changed and why, maintaining a clear project history.