compare-investments

Compare investment opportunities into a structured matrix with narrative synthesis.

Updated Apr 24, 2026

Search Tags:#investment #portfolio #risk #decision-support #compare #diligence #family-office

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/intelligent-alpha/plugins --skill compare-investments

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: compare-investments
Source: https://github.com/intelligent-alpha/plugins/tree/main/intelligent-alpha/skills/compare-investments
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/intelligent-alpha/plugins --skill compare-investments

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamline investment decision-making by performing head-to-head comparisons of investment opportunities, aligned to the family's philosophy and diligence outputs.

Core Features & Use Cases

Side-by-side comparison: Produce a structured matrix covering strategy, team, track record, terms, risk, and portfolio fit for each opportunity.
Diligence-aware synthesis: Surface data gaps and inconsistencies, and present a narrative that highlights implications for choice.
Use Case: When choosing between two or more funds or deals after initial diligence, summarize differences and support IC discussions.

Quick Start

Compare two opportunities A and B using the latest diligence outputs and family philosophy.

Frequently Asked Questions about compare-investments

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I compare two investment opportunities side-by-side after diligence?▼

To compare investment opportunities, you can generate a structured matrix covering strategy, team, track record, terms, risk, and portfolio fit for each deal. This synthesizes diligence outputs and family philosophy into a clear, side-by-side comparison table.

What is the best way to summarize fund differences for an investment committee?▼

Summarizing fund differences for an investment committee requires a diligence-aware narrative that highlights implications for choice. This approach surfaces data gaps and inconsistencies to support IC discussions effectively.

Can I evaluate multiple deals if I only have partial diligence data?▼

Evaluating multiple deals with partial diligence data is possible, but the tool will explicitly surface those data gaps and inconsistencies. It requires available diligence outputs and family philosophy inputs to produce defendable results with caveats.

Does family philosophy factor into head-to-head investment comparisons?▼

Family philosophy does factor into head-to-head investment comparisons as a required overlay. The evaluation aligns investment opportunities with the family's philosophy alongside per-opportunity diligence outputs to determine portfolio fit.

When should I use a structured investment comparison matrix?▼

You should use a structured investment comparison matrix when choosing between two or more funds or deals after initial diligence. It streamlines decision-making by summarizing differences across strategy, team, track record, terms, risk, and portfolio fit.